Multi-utilitarianism in two-agent quasilinear social choice

نویسنده

  • Christopher P. Chambers
چکیده

We introduce a new class of rules for resolving quasilinear social choice problems. These rules extend those of Green [6]. We call such rules multi-utilitarian rules. Each multi-utilitarian rule is associated with a probability measure over the set of weighted utilitarian rules, and is derived as the expectation of this probability. These rules are characterized by the axioms efficiency, translation invariance, monotonicity, continuity, and additivity. By dropping monotonicity, we characterize the class of generalized multi-utilitarian rules. These rules are associated with a signed measure which assigns total measure one to the set of weighted utilitarian rules.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Utilitarianism and equality for quasilinear or Gorman-form preferences

The paper shows that if utility is cardinally measurable and fully interpersonally comparable and the utility profile satisfies (a) a happier person has lower marginal utility of the numeraire or wealth, and (b) “everybody is equally unhappy in hell,” the utilitarian criterion is egalitarian for quasilinear economies or Gorman-form preferences . JEL Classification: D6

متن کامل

Indian Institute of Science Bangalore , India July 2012 Bayesian Mechanisms

Recall that we mentioned two possible routes to get around the Gibbard–Satterthwaite Impossibility Theorem. The first was to focus on restricted environments like the quasilinear environment, and the second one was to weaken the implementation concept and look for an SCF which is ex-post efficient, nondictatorial, and Bayesian incentive compatible. In this section, our objective is to explore t...

متن کامل

Egalitarianism and utilitarianism in committees of representatives

We consider a committee of representatives that makes dichotomous choices (acceptance/rejection) by vote. Given the size of each group represented, what is the most adequate voting rule for the committee? We provide answers based on each of the two principles commonly used to make normative assessments in di¤erent contexts: egalitarianism and utilitarianism. To that end, we introduce utilities ...

متن کامل

A new approach to rights in social choice theory which incorporates utilitarianism

The paper axiomatises a generalised utilitarian aggregation rule, under which different weights are assigned to utilities depending on the different rights involved. The relationship between actions, rights and the evaluation of utilities is investigated. Application is made to a famous example, Edwin-Angelina-the Judge, which appears in the social choice literature.

متن کامل

The Clarke Tax Algorithm

The idea behind the Clarke Tax Algorithm is that a tax will be assessed to each individual. The amount of this tax depends on how the individual’s utilities affect the rest of the group. Since people do not want to pay taxes, a big assessment will decrease an individual’s overall utility. To get a better understanding of this statement, it is helpful to restrict the problem a bit. Formally, the...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Int. J. Game Theory

دوره 33  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005